3/20/2023 0 Comments Pushpal 00Entertainment Shah Rukh Khan answers who will be the next 'big thing' after him, reveals what he disliked about Pathaan: 'I will have to be fired, won't retire'.Fresh quake hits Turkey-Syria border area two weeks after disaster.PM Modi denied permit to land in Tura stadium, BJP, ally-in-power NPP trade charges.The FIR is on sections including 120B (criminal conspiracy), 420 (cheating), 467, 468, 471 (related to forgery) of the Indian Penal Code and relevant sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The agency alleged that wrongful loss to the tune of Rs 83.19 crore was caused to both banks in total. The CBI has alleged that forged financial statements were submitted and funds were siphoned off from debtors. It states that the case resulted out of a complaint filed by an official of Union Bank of India in 2020 claiming that Pushpak Bullions’ directors had entered into a criminal conspiracy and got credit facilities sanctioned aggregating to Rs 140 crore to it from Union Bank of India and Bank of India. The current FIR dates back to transactions preceding the earlier FIR. The special court had in August accepted the CBI’s report and closed the case stating that the queries raised by it were answered satisfactorily by the central agency, even as the ED opposed the report, claiming an improper probe by the CBI. The court had directed the CBI to continue its probe and again in 2022 the agency said that it stood by its closure report and maintained that there was no evidence. In 2020, however, the CBI had filed its first closure report claiming that there was no evidence to substantiate the charges. The amount was alleged to have been transferred into an NPA (Non-Performing Asset) account in the name of Pushpak Bullion Pvt Ltd, maintained with the same bank.īuy 2-year plan with SD20 code for special price It was claimed that this was done by fabricating records at the time of demonetisation where notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 were withdrawn as currency. In 2017, the CBI and subsequently the Enforcement Directorate (ED) had named Pushpak Bullions in separate complaints claiming that between November 15 and November 26, 2016, cash to the tune of Rs 84.6 crore was fraudulently shown to have been deposited in a current account of two companies. Last month, the CBI had also approached the court seeking permission to conduct searches in Mumbai and other places linked to the case. Patel on Tuesday approached the special CBI court in Mumbai seeking anticipatory bail, which is scheduled for hearing next week. The FIR names Pushpak Bullions, a company engaged in bullion trading and manufacturing and export of jewellery, its directors Chandrakant Patel, Amit Sampat and unknown public servants of Union Bank of India and Bank of India.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |